Collectors: Open Telemetry vs. LM Collector
Hi, We're looking to create a networking "appliance" that we can send to small locations, like a retail store. Among other things, this appliance will allow us to do some gateway to gateway tunneling allowing for user support, but in addition, we want to include key devices in monitoring as well. Originally, we were thinking that we would do a LM Collector install in a container on the device (in this case, we were experimenting with a MikrtoTik). The problem is that LM Collector supports Linux on 64-Bit AMD installs, but not 64-bit ARM installs which many (most?) appliance types would use. Open Telemetry, however, can be used in a 64-bit ARM container. On the surface, it appeared that we could maybe use an Open Telemetry collector for basic stuff instead of LM Collector. But, the closest I get to a comparison of what Open Telemetry collector can do, compared to LM Collector is that Open Telemetry collects "telemetry" and LM Collector collects "metrics" ... which are, of course, entirely useless descriptions if you don't know already what they are doing. :) I understand that they are not interchangeable, but in the end, I'm trying to determine a few things: if not interchangeable, what to use each for? can Open Telemetry collector be used for the most basic monitoring? any other ideas for Linux 64-bit ARM based collector? Since every time I ask anything close to this question to support, I get pointed to the links about Open Telemetry collector, let me pre-empt that (to avoid that in the answer) and say that we've looked at these links: https://www.logicmonitor.com/support/adding-an-opentelemetry-collector https://www.logicmonitor.com/support/configurations-for-opentelemetry-collector-container-installation https://www.logicmonitor.com/support/opentelemetry-collector-for-logicmonitor-overview https://www.logicmonitor.com/support/opentelemetry-collector-installation-from-contrib-distribution https://www.logicmonitor.com/support/opentelemetry-collector-installation-from-logicmonitor-wizard and they don't answer the questions above, far as we can tell. :)Solved190Views3likes10CommentsFinding the culprit for TCP_StatsCollector ConnectionsEstablished alert for Windows collectors
From the collector’s device page in the LM Portal or the collectors page, get to a debug console, then here’s your !POSH one-liner to get info about the destination device that is holding your ports captive. netstat -an| sls establish | foreach { ($_ -split "\s+")[3] } | group | sort count | select count, name -last 10 In the Netstat, a shows all, n shows IP addresses rather than solving the DNS for it. TheSelect-String (aliased as sls)passes only the “Established” connection entries from the netstat down the pipeline. The foreach{} splits each line ($_ is the current object being iterated by the foreach loop) on contiguous whitespace (I use this a lot!) and takes the third element (remote address:port) to passdown the pipeline It then passes Group-Object (aliased as group) which bundles identical strings and Sort-Object (aliased as sort)by the count property of the group object. The select displays grabs the calculated match count and the name properties to limit display and just shows the -last 10 of them (which are the biggest number of matched lines due to the sort previously applied. This should give you the target/s for troubleshooting further.68Views11likes5CommentsHow many collectors do you have?
Hello, Our Logic Monitor environment is overloaded. What is the best practices to expand? We have currenty 64 collectors “All the same size” and ourinternal LM Support for the collectors is requesting 52 new collectors!! They are taking the approach to create collectors all the same size for 10,000 instances. I was thinking about other routes 1. bigger collectors if possible for 30,000 instances each may be... 2. minimize the number of instances by cleaning up what is not needed but I am not sure anybody will know We have an AZURE Collector VZPOHIALGCMON01 with 82,305 instances !!! I reviewed this Collector Capacity | LogicMonitorand apparenlty we could expand another way than the one selected !!! Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Dom127Views2likes2CommentsUse AWS Unified Cloudwatch Agent to replace Logic Monitor Collector in multiple AWS accounts
Is there any way to use the AWS Unified CloudWatch Agent and Cloudwatch Logs load EC2 metrics into LogicMonitor similar to what is pulled from theLogicMonitor collector? A little background. We currently use two LogicMonitor collectors to gather Windows metrics from AWS EC2 instances and physical and virtual servers in our on-prem datacenter. This has worked well for the 100 Windows servers and network devices we are monitoring. We are moving all of our on-prem Windows applications to AWS, which requires we change the way we use AWS. Take a look at AWS Control Tower for more details Instead of one AWS account and one VPC ( network ) , we are moving every application and environment ( PROD, UAT, DEV, STAGE ) into different AWS account. No shared networking, so VPC peering or using a TGW isn't an option. This will result in about 20 new AWS accounts and up to 100 by the end of the year. Each of these accounts will have 2 to 20 EC2 Windows instances for web/application along with one EC2 or RDS based Microsoft SQL Server instance. I have no desire to pay for EC2 Windows instances for every account ( possibly hundreds ) just to run the LogicMonitor collector. The most important Windows server monitoring features we rely on in LogicMonitor boil down to - server is down ( ping loss ) - low disk space - high CPU utilization - the ability to alert on Windows Event log entries - Windows service X is not running Then tack on monitoring of an EC2 and RDS Microsoft SQL Server performance data Does LogicMonitor have any recommendations or examples on this type of configuration? Thanks in advance, Kevin Foley11Views1like1CommentAdd device to Collector with least devices in rest api
I hope someone here can help, Using powershell and the rest API I would like to do a lookup of selected collectors find which has the least amount of devices on it then add the a new device. I have the script for adding the device and that works greatjust need the collector lookup, has anyone done something similar. Thank you in advanced for all help provided PaulSolved31Views0likes49CommentsInternal Website Checks - Change alerting behavior when one collector does down
It looks like if a collector goes down, the internal website check won't trigger the alert for website-overall, if we configure alert trigger to "at All test locations" and have more than one collector assigned to monitor the app. Strangely, I can see in the raw data and graphs that the website-Overall does switch value to 2 (i.e. not OK). We are an AWS shop and deploy collectors in each client's VPC AND from a collector that has routing to the client VPC (e.g. from the client's on-prem network). We were conducting DR testing where the AWS based collector was "killed" along with the rest of the VPC, but we never saw an alert trigger for website-Overall.5Views0likes0CommentsNative PowerShell support on Linux Collectors
In case some of you are not aware, Microsoft released Linux-compatible version of PowerShell. I would love to see the Linux Collector come bundled with PowerShell so it can be supported natively. Just for giggles, I installed PowerShell on a random RHEL 7 collector and tried to use the !posh debug command, but sadly it didn't work .4Views0likes0Comments